Kunstmatige intelligentie wordt een steeds groter onderdeel van ons leven. Het speelt een rol in onze opleiding, in ons werk, maar ook in ons dagelijks leven. Soms zelfs zonder dat we het door hebben. Maar wat zijn de voor- en nadelen van kunstmatige intelligentie? En hoe kan het bijdragen aan gelijke kansen?
By Robin Pocornie, Sander Heithuis and Xanne Visser for WOMEN Inc. on April 25, 2022
Our own Jill Toh recently presented at a symposium on the use of technology and how it intersects with racism in the context of housing and policing. She spoke on a panel organised in the contex of the World Roma Day 2022 titled Technolution: Yearned-for Hopes or Old Injustices?.
Continue reading “Technology, Racism and Justice at Roma Day 2022”
Hoewel de ‘normen en waarden’ van het internet soms anders doen vermoeden, mag je foto’s waarop auteursrecht berust niet zomaar overal gebruiken. Het Algemeen Nederlands Persbureau, oftewel ANP, maakt daarom gebruik van een Belgische auteursrechtentrol – Permission Machine – om illegaal gebruik op te sporen en direct te beboeten. Hans de Zwart, bestuurslid van het Racism and Technology Center, ondervond dat zelf. We spreken met hem én Edouard van Arem, manager foto bij ANP.
By Edouard van Arem, Hans de Zwart and Joe van Burik for BNR Nieuwsradio on March 23, 2022
The Racism and Technology Center co-signed an open letter asking the EU member states to make sure that the upcoming Digital Services Act will abolish so-called ‘dark patterns’ and advertising that is based on tracking and harvesting personal data.
Continue reading “72 civil society organisations to the EU: “Abolish tracking-based online advertising””
The Racism and Technology Center organised a panel titled Centering social injustice, de-centering tech: The case of the Dutch child benefits scandal and beyond at Privacy Camp 2022, a conference that brings together digital rights advocates, activists, academics and policymakers. Together with Merel Koning (Amnesty International), Nadia Benaissa (Bits of Freedom) and Sanne Stevens (Justice, Equity and Technology Table), the discussion used the Dutch child benefits scandal as an example to highlight issues of deeply rooted racism and discrimination in the public sector. The fixation on algorithms and automated decision-making systems tends to obscure these fundamental problems. Often, the use of technology by governments functions to normalise and rationalise existing racist and classist practices.
Continue reading “Centering social injustice, de-centering tech”
In het kader van de Big Brother Awards van 2021 legt Naomi Appelman uit hoe predictive policing in Nederland ingezet wordt (voor zover we dat weten) en wat daar de problematische kanten van zijn.
By Inge Wannet, Lotte Houwing and Naomi Appelman for Big Brother Awards 2021 on December 13, 2021
Our very own Naomi Appelman was interviewed for Atlas, a Dutch television show about science and current affairs. She talked about her research into what laws and regulations democracies should develop to ensure that large technology companies don’t unnecessarily exclude people.
Continue reading “Regulating big tech to make sure nobody is excluded”
De Big Five: Google, Amazon, Facebook, Apple en Microsoft. Deze vijf machtige digitale platformen beheersen onze levens met slimme algoritmes en aanhoudende monopolies. Maar we kunnen ook niet meer zonder: door een storing zaten we vorige week allemaal urenlang zonder Facebook, Whatsapp en Instagram. En dat betekende; paniek. Hoe tem je de Big Five?
By Naomi Appelman for NPO Start on October 13, 2021
The kickoff of the 3rd DCFA Fellowship with technofuturist Galit Ariel, Katerina Makrogamvraki of Civic AI Lab, and Hans de Zwart of Racism and Technology Center about fair Artificial Intelligence.
By Galit Ariel, Hans de Zwart and Katerina Makrogamvraki for Pakhuis de Zwijger on September 13, 2021
The past year has been filled with examples of technologies being racist. Yet, how we can fight this is hardly part of societal debate in the Netherlands. This must change, Jill Toh and Naomi Appelman write. Making these racist technologies visible is the first step towards acknowledging that technology can indeed be racist.
By Jill Toh and Naomi Appelman for Lilith on July 13, 2021
Surveillancesoftware benadeelt mensen van kleur, blijkt uit onderzoek. Waarom gebruikt de UvA het dan nog, vragen Naomi Appelman, Jill Toh en Hans de Zwart.
By Hans de Zwart, Jill Toh and Naomi Appelman for Het Parool on July 6, 2021
A newly-launched Racism and Technology Center will analyse and highlight how technology perpetuates racism and racist practices in Dutch society, as part of an effort to “help in fighting systemic injustices and oppression,” say its founders.
From Statewatch on April 9, 2021
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Baskerville 2 by Anders Noren.